PHILOSOPHY 100 THE BLOG OF THE FALL 2010 PHIL 100 CLASS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS

Wednesday
Dec022009

ROCK AND ART

You've got a guitar. That's no reason to get a paintbrush

Paul Morley concedes that pop music and art have much in common. But, by and large, those who can do one of them shouldn't be allowed near the other

            Buzz up!

            Digg it

            Paul Morley

            The Observer, Sunday 19 April 2009

            Article history

I don't know about you, but in my constantly updated list of the top 20 things likely to lead to an instant anxiety attack, with accompanying stabbing melancholy, at No 12 is "paintings by rock musicians". (No 1 is reading lists, No 2 is the making of lists, and No 3 is complaining about lists, but I've learned to take medication for this, as otherwise in a world made up of lists I would not be able to move a muscle.)

The art of very few rock musicians is not the needy equivalent of a side project, or hobby, produced by those who decide that because there are fans interested in their music there will be interest in any apparently artistic thing they do. I can live with the modest watercolours and sketches of Bob Dylan, not feel that the lonely spaces, rough colours and nonchalant scratchings compromise the intimate universe of sensation he's created through the nuanced linking of thinking and music. They're sort of charming - possibly therapeutic - visual notes austerely suggesting a special, spooky imagination temporarily at rest, and it would be churlish to feel disappointed that he is not as much a Manet, Picasso or Duchamp outside of song, and his sublime, reckless control of such.

Captain Beefheart/Don Van Vliet, of course, is no dabbler, just a painter who also made music - Magic Band member Zoot Horn Rollo described Beefheart music as "Jackson Pollock trying to play John Lee Hooker" and if turned into sound his pre/post/ill/-logical paintings of people, beasts, plants, and spirits would exist in more or less the same cracked but soothing time/space frame as his music.

Joni Mitchell says she sings her sorrow and paints her joy, and it's around about her paintings, nice and attractive as they can be, and not too dispiriting when used for her record sleeves, that the problems surface: compare the drenching sentimentality, stale symbolism and stiff autobiographical sincerity of her paintings with the shifting, elusive quality of her songs. And, alas, there's the unavoidable key element of whether anyone would be interested in the work as art if it wasn't for the fact she was who her songs and voice say she is. This goes for just about every rock musician artist, all the way up to Bowie and Dylan - and Beefheart and Brian Eno escape this indictment both because of the art they produce and the fact that their music emerges from their personal ideas and private visions about life, experience, memory and time in the same ways as their art. Their art does not seem like pretty souvenirs you would buy in a gift shop virtually attached to their image, best transferred to tea towel, fridge magnet and umbrella. The dashing, persuasively reserved painting actions of ex-Clash bassist Paul Simonon, and the deadpan squalls and chattering abstractions of the Stone Roses' John Squire, could have a modest independent life if they had different biographies, but not quite cost the same.

Fragile Pete Doherty's fragile paintings using his blood for paint might perhaps be taken more seriously if he hadn't been tabloid bludgeoned. The works perhaps explain why his songs can seem a little bloodless. Beck collaborated with his grandfather, the Fluxus artist Al Hansen, on an exhibition but Beck's twee, sticky collages - or "orchestrations" as he preferred to call them - of found bits and pieces looked lacklustre next to Al's skewered, affectionate and essence-fixing absurdism.

Beck comes nowhere near to replicating the lively, patched-together electro-comic panache of his songs, which are in effect the post-Fluxus works of art. His songs, as thrilling pieces of play, accidentally echo a little of the calculation of Duchamp. His "works of art" make you wince - they're ultimately as camply bad as Tony Bennett's canvases - and confirm that even one of the great pop artists exposes himself badly outside the relatively sheltered rock world.

Joni's songs lure you into the strangeness of existence, and use tonal colours and textures unique to her. The paintings go the other way, and are a presentation of consoling obviousness using colours and techniques you can most directly spot in the art of other rock musicians. You can't miss her love for Van Gogh - she's Fan Gogh number 1. Her subject matter also has a naive obviousness - the unblushing obviousness of a Twitterer - and a lot of rock musicians who toy with art, seduced by the hollow glamour of the gallery showing, the idea that they have found a way to inform others of the ordinary things on their mind, share the vanity, insecurity and artlessness of the chronic Twitterer.

It is this artlessness, this instant standardised nostalgia, that is a common theme in rock musician artists who, when the trappings supplied in the rock world are removed, lose whatever dignity and even mystique they might have picked up as, say, ex-members of the Beatles or ex-Jefferson Airplane sirens or salaried members of the Rolling Stones.

Paul McCartney's gauche paintings possess all the ugliness he exiles from his music, as a devoted sentimentalist and professional sweetheart, but none of those other things he also exiles, consciously or not - depth, shadow, intrigue, luminosity. If turned into sound, his art would be de Kooning trying to play Black Lace. Grace Slick battles with Ronnie Wood for the saddest possible example of the rock musician artist earnestly raiding their professional musical life and turning it into kitsch mementos. If Ronnie played guitar like he draws and paints - he gaily knocks out fellow Stones, Ali, Elvis, Womack, chimps, trees - he would be of no use to even a non-league equivalent Rolling Stones tribute band. On some art equivalent of Strictly Come Dancing, his Jim Morrison portrait might just edge out Grace Slick's - Ronnie goes for some kind of brute intensity, Grace for the pretty and saintly. Both do the standard rock star artist compositional thing, and have the subject vacantly stare ahead, with no hint of the tense, tangled inner life that made them who they ended up being. Or maybe they have both brilliantly captured deadness. Joni's whimsical Jimi features a burning guitar and angel wings. Grace's mundane Jimi is concealed by sky and clouds. Ronnie doesn't do Jimi, although a couple of his Jaggers come close and his many unmoody, eerily approximate paintings of Keith Richards would be a little better if they were painted in his own blood. Keith's or Ronnie's. Better still, Pete Doherty's.

Grace, to be fair, seems a little more aware of her place as gallant amateur with a hall of fame name than Ronnie, and if you have ever wondered what a Beryl Cook painting of Jerry Garcia would look like, thanks to Grace, you can now know. As the writer and singer of White Rabbit, she's naturally done a few jolly Alice paintings, with about as much appreciation of surrealism, wonder or any acid sensibility as Pam Ayres. Grace's sickly-sweet tableaux paintings of the Monterey and Woodstock festivals from the backstage point of view of someone who was there and participated live up to her motto that she was too stoned to remember most of the details. They seem inspired by the Where's Wally books, with a hopeful dab of cockeyed Simpsons gaiety.

Oddly enough, many paintings by rock musicians do feature this similarly bright but insipid, almost childlike colour spectrum, as though they all shop in the same store for supplies, and don't seem to mind that the cosy, story-telling art they produce reveals an embarrassingly limited imagination and often a weird kind of fluffy optimism. No sign yet of Amy's smoked banana art, Duffy's melodramatic lipstick swirls, Cheryl Cole's Hieronymus Bosch visions of life with the girls, Lady GaGa's pen and ink drawings of her sunglass collection... I'd better stop before I give Simon Cowell an idea for a new show. (Judges: Cowell with Lily Allen, David Furnish and Laurence Llewelyn-Bowen.)

Wednesday
Dec022009

jay-z

Jay-Z Reps for Grizzly Bear "What the indie rock movement is doing right now is very inspiring." As pretty much the entire music blogosphere already knows, Jay-Z, along with Beyoncé and Solange Knowles, attended JellyNYC's free Grizzly Bear show at Brooklyn's Williamsburg Waterfront yesterday. This surprise royal visit led to this pretty hilarious video of Jay and Beyoncé swaying to "Ready, Able". As he tells MTV today, Jay himself doesn't see anything weird about the world's most recognizable rapper going to see an indie band: "I don't understand why people are always surprised to see me at shows! I've always said that I believe in good music and bad music, so I'm always at those type of events. I like music. The second Blueprint, the reason it was so all over the place was because I love music so much, so there's records on there with Lenny Kravitz and Sean Paul and Dr. Dre. I've done records with Chris Martin. I'm all over the place because of my taste in music." But Grizzly Bear isn't exactly the same thing as Lenny Kravitz, and Jay knows it. To hear Jay tell it, he hopes Grizzly Bear and "the indie rock movement" in general will "push rap". Here's the exact quote: "[Grizzly Bear is] an incredible band. The thing I want to say to everyone-- I hope this happens because it will push rap, it will push hip-hop to go even further-- what the indie rock movement is doing right now is very inspiring. It felt like us in the beginning. These concerts, they're not on the radio, no one hears about them, and there's 12,000 people in attendance. And the music that they're making and the connection they're making to people is really inspiring. So I hope that they have a run where they push hip-hop back a little bit, so it will force hip-hop to fight to make better music. Because it can happen. Because that's what rap did to rock. "When rock was the dominant force in music, rap came and said, 'Y'all got to sit down for a second, this is our time.' And we've had a stranglehold on music since then. So I hope indie rock pushes rap back a bit because it will force people to make great music for the sake of making great music." Posted by Tom Breihan on August 31, 2009 at 5 p.m.

Tuesday
Sep082009

PHIL 100 SYLLABUS

PHILOSOPHY 100 SYLLABUS FALL 2009

 

HL 209, 211

 

WF  11:30 - 12:50 HOL 209

            1:00 - 2:20    HOL 211

 

INSTRUCTOR: KEVIN O'NEILL, PROFESSOR OF PHILOSOPHY

OFFICE:  BEKINS 101 JOHNSTON CENTER

748-8655

CELL: 3238415171

EMAIL kevin_oneill@fastmail.fm

 

OFFICE HOURS: Monday 12 - 2

Friday 2:30 - 4:00

Alternate Tuesdays 1 - 3

 

COURSE DESCRIPTION

 We all believe in things that we cannot in a strict sense see. Most of us believe in God or a higher power or a guiding force. We believe in karma, destiny, and fate. We believe in justice and love and kindness. We believe that every human being has a unique identity somewhere "inside", hidden from the world. We believe there are unseen forces in history, in biology, in the physical world. And so forth. Some of us even believe that the dead speak and walk.

 

This class investigates our beliefs in what we cannot see directly but believe in nonetheless. It also investigates the difference between what we can see and what we cannot, and looks into the rules we use to tell whether something is or is not real.

These are the kinds of questions that philosophers have been pondering for a long time and that occur to people every day. The key difference between regular people and philosophers is that we philosophers are a little obsessive about such issues. We love to ask questions, top probe, to push. We are rarely satisfied with consoling or plausible or "grown-up" answers. We pause and mess around with what most people think are obvious answers and settled truths.

 

By entering this class you are entering the world of philosophers in general and my world in particular.  I love to ask questions, all day, every day. I am skeptical, restless, and impatient, on edge. The people you will read are not all as aggravating but all have this in common: they are not easily satisfied with stock answers.

 

When the class is done I cannot predict anything about what you will bring away with you. But I do know that some of you will learn to be a little more skeptical, a little less willing to take things as they are given, and in the long run that might be a good thing, especially in a political system and culture in which we claim to value responsible choice.

 

 

EVALUATION

You will write FOUR short papers in response to particular questions or materials that I will give you. There will also be a take-home final and a Manifesto, of which more later.

Essays will be from 3 -7 pages in length, depending on the topic. Be prepared to write about religious belief, personal identity, truth, freedom, beauty and other such vast topics.

You will all be offered the option of rewriting any essay once.

You will be judged on how well you state your position, how carefully you offer arguments to defend that position and how ell you respond to objections to your position. Philosophy has a lot to do with making arguments - that is, saying, "I believe X" and then giving reasons for the belief and also reasons why you reject alternative beliefs.

We will go over all this in class many, many times; my purpose is to teach you how better to stake out as claim on truth and defend that claim in appropriate ways. Note that this does not mean that I thin that every belief one has needs to be defended on purely factual and rational grounds. Sometimes we need to make acts of faith and sometimes those acts have to be a little bit blind. The secret is to figure out when such faith is justified and when it is not.

 

You will be evaluated overall -- that is each essay will count, as will the final and the Manifesto, but we can negotiate relative weights for all assignments. Speaking roughly, each essay will count for 20 points; the final will count for 10 and the Manifesto for another 10.

 

Class attendance is of course a given. Learning is a collaborative effort. You attend University voluntarily and I must assume that you are in class because that is your choice. Therefore since we are in the class together, and by choice, you should show up just as I should show up and if either of us needs to miss a session (which should happen very infrequently for either of us), I will let you know beforehand and will expect you to let me know beforehand as well. Not letting you know would be discourteous and unprofessional. And each time I miss -- or you miss-- we have to come up with some way to compensate for the absence.

 

 

BOOK:

We will read selections from the 2007 edition of John Cottingham's Western Philosophy. If you need to you can get away with earlier editions, namely the one from 1996. Make sure, however, that the Part and Section numbers assigned below, which are based on the 2007 edition, sync with the numbers in your edition. If you have older edition please come up after class and we can coordinate assignments very quickly.

 

CALENDAR

SEPTEMBER

 

9 INTRODUCTION. READ PART VI, NUMBER 9 PP. 382-387 (THIS AND ALL LATER REFERENCES ARE TO COTTINGHAM'S 2007 EDITION OF WESTERN PHILOSOPHY).

 

11 DISCUSS JAMES AND WILL TO BELIEVE. READ PART VI, NUMBER 6, THE ARGUMENT FROM DESIGN. PP. 365 -370.

 

16 DISCUSS ARGUMENT FROM DESIGN. READ PART VI, SECTION 2, PP. 348 -350 AND SECTION 1, PP. 345-347.

 

18 DISCUSS CLASSIC GOD PROOFS. READ PART VI, SECTION 12, 399 - 405.

 

23 DISCUSS RELIGION AND EVIDENCE.  READ PART VI, SECTION 8, 376 - 381

 

25 DISCUSS SUBJECTIVITY AND FAITH.

 

30 DISCUSS RELIGIOUS FAITH AND GOD

 

OCTOBER

 

2 RELIGIOUS BELIEF ESSAY DUE. POSSIBLE IN-CLASS DEBATE ON GOD.  READ PART V, SECTION 4,             290 - 295.

 

 7 IDENTITY, MIND AND BODY. DISCUSS FREUD AND THE UNCONSCIOUS. READ PART IV, SECTIONS 1 AND 2, 201 - 213.

 

9 DISCUSS THE SOUL. READ PART IV, SECTION 4, 221-226.

 

14 DISCUSS THE ISOLATED CONSCIOUSNESS. READ PART V, SECTION 10, 320 - 325.

 

16 DISCUSS EXISTENTIAL FREEDOM. READ PART IV, SECTION 10, 251 - 255.

 

21 DISCUSS FREEDOM. READ PART IV, SECTION 12, 263 - 267.

 

23 DISCUSS IDENTITY AND FREEDOM.

 

28 FREEDOM/ IDENTITY ESSAY DUE.

 

30 MEANING AND LIFE BEGIN DISCUSSION OF PLATO'S CAVE, PART II, SECTION 1, 67 - 68 AND PART I, SECTION 1, 3 - 9.

 

NOVEMBER

4 DISCUSS CAVE AND INNATE IDEAS. READ PART XII, SECTION 6, 782 -786, AND SECTION 7, 786 - 789.

 

6 DISCUSS LIFE AS MEANINGLESS. READ PART XII, SECTIONS 8 AND 9, 790 - 799.

 

11 DISCUSSION EXISTENTIAL DEFIANCE. READ PART XII, SECTION 11, 809 -814 AND PART XII, SECTIONS 1 AND 2, 765 - 770.

 

13 DISCUSS BELIEF AND STOICISM. READ PART V, SECTION 6, 302 - 306. SET UP DISCUSSION OF MEANING.

 

18 DISCUSS MEANING.

 

20 MEANING ESSAY DUE.

 

25 T-GIVING

 

27 T-GIVING

 

DECEMBER

2 THE VALUE OF ART - IN THESE LAST CLASSES WE WILL DISCUSS THE IMPORTANCE OF ART -- MUSIC, FILM, VIRAL VIDEO AND SO FORTH, READINGS WILL BE SELECTED AT THIS TIME.

 

4

 

9

 

11 ART ESSAY DISCUSSED.

 

15 ART ESSAY DUE.

 

 

 

 

Page 1 2